SAMPLE
DAILY COMMENTARY
This
page is a sample of the Daily Commentary that goes with the
real time Commentary & System Trade Signals that is posted
each day, and restricted to, paid
subscribers. I have selected the time frame from January
16 to January 30 because it shows my reading on the markets
as they topped, day by day, and how I protected profits of
18% for January 2004. The NASDAQ peaked on Jan 20 the S&P
500 on Jan 26.
Then
you will see what I wrote day by day as the markets started
to end their correction the middle of March, and then turned
bullish the end of March and the beginning of April 2004.
I suggest that you print this out and read it, from the bottom
of the page to the top (as each day is written and added that
way), as you look at a chart of the NASDAQ or it's proxy,
QQQ. This will give you a much better perspective as to how
I read the markets and trade. I trust you will find it very
insightful and will want to get this page in real time, every
day by subscribing.
Daily Commentary – Close Friday April 2, 2004
Wow – what a week! And today topped it off. Everyone has
been waiting for job formation, and the consensus number was
123,000 jobs created in the last month. The optimists thought
200,000, and we got 308,000, plus January and February were
also revised upward. How could they sell the market with those
numbers, even though it was overextended short term. The market
opened very strong, and then for the rest of the day it was
like watching paint dry, ending firm and putting the icing
on a great week. It’s probably safe to say the correction
we’ve been experiencing has been put to rest. Now what happens?
Don’t be surprised to see some profit taking short term, and
the believers who did buy at the bottom have lots of profits.
Be aware we are starting into earnings season with earnest,
and profits should be good. Speaking for myself, I want to
avoid being in any stock when profits are announced.
Speaking of profits, our system did great guns. I’ve stayed
conservative in my IRA account. My margin accounts I went
aggressive and thanks to stocks like MAMA, TINY and DWCH,
the aggressive account was up 37% this week. The IRA was up
4.3%. Today the system went long CHINA, TMTA and SINA. I sold
DHC, a defensive purchase back on 3/26, at 9.46 for a profit
of $0.39 per share. The reason I sold was to have cash to
buy stocks with more potential to move quickly. As of Friday’s
close the IRA owned MU, AZPN, SKX, PTN, EMRG, ECGI and TMTA.
My other accounts also have DWCH, TINY, XICO and CHINA. The
System Composite Portfolio also contains ALTI and MCD which
I do not own.
Daily Commentary – Close Thursday April 1, 2004
The “tiny” mouse that roared. The market edged higher today,
started to weaken and again they “bought 'em” at the end.
The hot news today was the oil patch. Revisiting last Wednesday’s
commentary, the call was correct on the top in crude and today
the selling was heavy in gasoline and crude futures. Good
news at the pump for all of us and a good for the markets.
Another hot group today was the nano technology group. All
the stocks in the group broke out VERY strongly. Another sign
the traders are back to playing the long side. Fortunately
we already had TINY, the best of the bunch. The system had
a buy signal elected today in ALTI, although I did not personally
trade it as we were already long TINY and were fully invested
in the IRA account. Also purchased today was XICO.
Tomorrow is the big news day of the week – the employment
number. Is the market going to roar with a good number? Or,
if we get a disappointing number, we could get clobbered.
And don’t forget the “buy the rumor, sell fact” mentality
of traders. The sharp advance off the bottom makes me very
leery short term regardless of “the number.” But we trade
stocks and step aside only on stock reports (earnings) etc,
but not for general market reports. So hang on for what may
be a wild ride and watch your stops closely.
Daily Commentary – Close Wednesday March 31, 2004
Oh MAMA! Despite the markets having a down day, my “stuff”
did great. After over 2 months, the trading is looking up.
This finishes the month and the first quarter. I use the NASDAQ
as a benchmark as those are primarily the stocks I trade,
with about a beta of 3 to that market. Using that as a reference,
on a relative basis I have not done badly – up 0.5% for the
year in the IRA whose account statements I post here. The
NASDAQ is down about 1% and the S&P is up about 1% for
the year. For March the IRA lost 7.2% and with the February
loss of 8.3%, that makes the first two losing months in a
row in the last 15. For the 15 month period dating back to
January 2003, the account is up 137.8%.
Today we had signals elected in EMRG, MU and MAMA. I am fully
invested in the IRA holding EMRG, ECGI, MU, PTN, AZPN, DHC
and SKX. In my other accounts I also own MAMA (and did she
ever pop today!), TINY and DWCH. My margin account is up 11.3%
for the year and about 8% of that came yesterday on the breakout
in MAMA. I bought at 11.04 and it finished the day at 13.68.
Daily Commentary – Close Tuesday March 30, 2004
Another up day! And I am sure you have noticed that instead
of selling the markets at the end of the trading day, they
are now buying – a sign of a bullish market. Rather than back
filling and testing last weeks lows, we have shot straight
up 5% off the bottom. Also a very good sign. After a good
run yesterday SKX opened lower and traders used the weakness
to buy and it finished strong – another good sign. Over the
last couple months we have gotten stocks that pop when we
buy, but they have quickly turned and sold off. We have one
more trading day in March. We are effectively even for the
year in all accounts, with January’s gains melting away over
the past two months. Maybe tomorrow we will end the quarter
positive? We are about 75% invested at this point, with some
interesting signals for tomorrow.
Today we had system trading signals elected in ECGI, PTN
and DWCH.
Daily Commentary – Close Monday March 29, 2004
I guess traders/investors had the weekend to mull over the
favorable market conditions last week, as the market opened
sharply higher and held well all day. It would have been quite
normal for the markets to start the week back filling after
last week’s gains, and the fact they were strong today makes
me feel there is a true shifting in sentiment out there to
the positive.
Today we had a systems signal elected in BFT at 6.15, which
then promptly reversed and we were stopped out at 5.96 for
a $0.19 per share loss. Other long signals today were AZPN,
SKX and TINY.
Daily Commentary – Close Friday March 26, 2004
After yesterday’s big gains, today was a quiet day down,
day on quiet volume to end the strong week – finally! I have
written a lot this week about this (possible, probable) turning
point, so I’ll be real brief today. Next week, hopefully,
will give us a good indication if we have put in a significant
bottom.
Today we bought DHC. We sold nothing Friday. The System Portfolio
Composite is long only in MCD, IED and DHC. In the IRA account
whose account statements I post here, I own only DHC. In my
other accounts I also actually own IED.
Daily Commentary – Close Thursday March 25, 2004
Wow, they actually bought all day today. Big gains, good
volume. Today was in contrast to the rally on March 17th on
weak volume – short covering I presume. But today was different.
The economic news was all good and the terrorism fears abated.
Perhaps this IS the end of the correction. We’ll see…
The NASDAQ has been the leader on the downside these past
2 months. Also true is that in the frenetic trading of January,
so many tech stocks had unsustainable run-ups and have been
really trashed during the last two moths. Does this mean the
NASDAQ will lag the S&P, if and when the bull markets
continue, as so many analysts predict? The answer is yes and
no. I think the stocks that were just a flash in the pan will
lag and hurt the NASDAQ’s total performance. But the REAL
growth NASDAQ stocks will definitely outperform the S&P
500. So don’t give up on tech. That will be where the real
action is. The universe of good trading tech and biotech stocks
will just be smaller. Remember, my objective is to find stocks
that have the potential for an explosive move of 50% in 4-6
weeks. That does not translate to the quality of any company’s
business model/earnings. Our best stock trade last year was
XYBR, which has been trashed by many analysts, and now trades
about $1.16. We bought it at 85 cents and in two weeks got
out at the top at $2.65. It may have another day in the sun,
and if it does, we’ll look to trade it again. That is my approach
to picking stocks. The system reads price and volume and anticipated
break outs. In a strongly upward trading general market background,
selecting the right stocks can result in very high percentage
gain months in my accounts. In a market trending down or choppy,
I take many small losses.
Daily Commentary – Close Wednesday March 24, 2004
No, I’m not the perpetual optimist. But I am a lot more optimistic
now at this low point in the market than I was in January
at the top. The assumption here is that we are nearing the
end of what was the long awaited correction in a very strong
bull market. Looking back to the very strong decade of the
1990's, the strongest periods lasted for about a year, and
like after the recent Feb 2003 - Jan 2004 run, there was always
a correction. I had talked about this before it happened.
I really believe we are close to the bottom. Today, the NASDAQ
held it’s lows and had an up day, albeit quiet. The S&P
took out its lows and rallied back, a sign the selling is
abating. The NASDAQ now has found support on it’s 200 day
moving average. Also a good sign is the fact that the contrary
indicator, the bullish sentiment of investment advisors has
fallen to 44% (below 50% is bullish). Shorting the QQQ is
used as” insurance” for portfolios in a down market, enabling
portfolio managers to keep the stocks they really like as
the market goes through a corrective phase. However, the fact
that 70% of the float are now sold short is very high and
I also read that to be a bullish contrary indicator.
Commodity prices have been a problem, even though the bond
market chart does not show that. Money has been flowing into
bonds as the market has weakened the last 2 months. But rising
commodity prices mean rising inflation. However, this writer
thinks we may be at a top in commodity prices. The dollar
rallied sharply yesterday and already has reversed its fall
into early February. Gold is very interesting. Gold made a
low the end of January, then took out that low the end of
February, then rallied with the 8 days previous to yesterday
being all up days. But looking at gold stocks (you can see
a composite of gold stocks by looking at the chart of XAU)
tells a different story. Gold stocks never did take out their
low the end of January, a bullish divergence – gold stocks
usually lead the price of bullion both up and down. Then we
had a second divergence, as bullion rallied sharply the last
2 weeks, gold stocks rallied only weakly and have actually
declined this past week. With geopolitical tensions easing,
the guess is that the gold stocks are telling us the current
run in gold may be over soon.
So much has been made of crude oil/gasoline prices being
so high and EVERYONE is bullish, i.e. not only lamenting the
high costs but pessimistic that prices will continue rising.
The chart of crude just put in what I call a triple spring
top, which at the very least, tells me that a correction has
started, or quite possibly a top is being put in. I plan to
write an article for the website on the chart patterns of
what I call double spring (DS) and triple spring (TS) tops
and bottoms. These patterns are more reliable for futures
than for stocks, for reasons I’ll explain in the article.
The net of it is, is that DS tops have a high degree of reliability
in predicting a top, but are not reliable indicators at bottoms.
TS bottoms tend to be very reliable, and occur fairly often.
TS tops occur rarely, but are extremely reliable. The last
TS top I saw was in the Eurodollar which marked the top of
the Euro on Feb 14th at $128.50. The Euro now stands at $121.
The point of all this is that the time is ripe for the next
leg up and the bull market in stocks to begin. Keep the faith.
I will continue to trade from the long side, despite it having
been a brutal last 2 months. My major fault in trading stocks
is that trading often unfolds slower than I anticipate, as
compared to futures. Consequently I can be (to) early in buying
stocks that do not break out – this is especially true when
markets are trending down or are choppy. It is also the reason
I like to scale out to take profits after a big run-up. Today
we were stopped out of XMSR at 26.00 for a profit of $0.07
per share and ARTX at 2.00 for a loss of $0.10 per share.
The System Portfolio composite is still long MCD, IED, CSTL. We
bought nothing today.
Daily Commentary – Close Tuesday March 23, 2004
The market was all over
the place today. After opening higher, sellers became bolder
when there was no good buying after the initial surge. Bottom
fishing traders were quick to do the reverse after the market
traded into negative territory, and the market moved up until
the half hour when they tanked it again. This market just
falls on it’s own weight with no news to inspire strong buying.
But when that news comes, whatever it is, the next move up
could be explosive. We’ll just continue to trade. I’m now
barely positive for the year. Beating the market averages
is not much of a consolation after being up 18% in January.
But that’s the market.
Today we were stopped out of SVVS at 2.00 for a loss of $0.12
per share. We bought the very thinly traded CSTL. Risky, but
looking at the chart will show you why I thought it was worth
the risk of losing 0.5% of equity. The System Portfolio Composite
is now long 5 stocks: ARTX, MCD, IED, XMSR and CSTL.
Daily Commentary – Close Monday March 22, 2004
Well so much for last week
being the bottom. Geopolitical events around the world spooked
the markets and our markets here took their cue from the international
bourses and headed lower from the get go. Volume on the NASDAQ
ran heavy. As I wrote in our “Understanding Risk/Reward,”
there are certain market risks that can and can’t be avoided,
and the worst unavoidable risk at the moment is another terrorist
attack on this country, which will kill the markets and surely
hurt our economy. If you want exposure to the stock market,
it's a risk you take and cannot control.
Terrorists are not stupid. They need not bring down another
major landmark or a government building. All they need to
do is bomb a bridge, tunnel, blow up a restaurant, stadium,
etc. You get the picture. It’s been 2-1/2 years since 9/11.
So why has it not happened? I think it is reasonable to think
they have certainly tried but have been foiled. If they succeeded,
the news would be all over the airwaves. But if they were
foiled, the government would have nothing to gain and a lot
to lose in telling us. All it would do is scare the people
and that in itself would have a tremendous effect on the economy.
Maybe I see too many movies, but my bet is that our best have
kept us physically safe and mentally secure. But the spector
of the Spanish train terrorist attack and the Israel assasination
of the Hamas leader did have quite an impact today.
We had a lot of buy signals
set up by last weeks trading range and needless to say, just
about everything broke down with the lone exception of ARTX,
which we bought today. Sold today was LOOK at 1.77 for a $0.09
profit per share. Sold for losses were LU at 3.89 for a loss
of <$0.13> per share, SIRI at 3.08 for <$0.11),
RIMM at $93.50 for <$1.17> and VSNT at 1.92 for <$0.29>.
Despite the risks per stock being small and worth taking,
as I explained last week, they are losses nonetheless. The
risk in trading is thinly traded issues like VSNT is high,
as we saw today. The market was called sharply down in the
pre-opening and someone must have put a market order in to
sell VSNT and the best bid was 1.37 and thus it opened at
that price. A stop order to sell at $2.00 (our stop) would
have been elected at the market when it opened at $1.37. We
had no stop in the market, as we have advised in low volume
stocks. Buyers rushed in at $1.37 and it quickly traded higher
and we got out at 1.92 (high was 2.02), a victory considering
it could have been a disastrous trade.
Daily Commentary – Close Friday March 19, 2004
Well we didn't get the strong up day I was anticipating (and
hoping) for. Volume was running light and it looked like we
were going to have a quiet, uneventful inside day. But selling
started in earnest in the afternoon. That in itself wouldn’t
be that bad, except the way the market finished on its lows
is not a good sign technically, even though the excuse was
triple witching expiration of options and futures. Even if
the last week’s trading action is to be a bottom, it would
be quite expected for it to be tested. Off of Friday’s action,
it looks like Monday morning could be important, and if it
starts weak, we would need to see buying to come in and have
an up day. Now for the good news. Sentiment is worsening
and the put/call ratio spiked to 1.03 Friday, both bullish
signs. A lot of good stocks have bounced or stabilized and
have not been pulled down by the force of the last two down
days of market action. Given the market conditions, it’s somewhat
hard to believe I am getting almost fully invested, and it
will be hard to choose from the list of stocks that my system
has buy signals in for Monday. The way I trade the system,
times like these have the highest risk and the highest reward.
Highest reward, because the system is not a pure momentum
system, as it is anticipatory of breakouts. High risk, because
a small bounce from here gets me fully invested and if there
is a another down leg to come, that translates to many small
loses. So, as I have been doing, I’m looking at trades that
carry a risk of less than 1% of equity. In other words, I’m
trading a conservative model, meaning on average I commit
10% or less of equity per trade.
Let’s put the markets in perspective. On a daily basis it's
all about sentiment. That creates the up and down choppy action
within all trends. And the markets in this correction are
fretting about interest rates and job formation. There is
no doubt the economy is growing rapidly. Interest rates –
does it really matter in the long run if the Fed raises interest
rates from 1% to 2%? Is that going to change anyone’s spending
plans – consumer or business? During the recession when the
Fed was dropping interest rates, the knee jerk response was
at first favorable, then the markets continued their trend
down. Expect the same thing to happen on the way up this time.
Jobs - to listen to the Democrats, you’d think we were in
a recession. We are about 1% away from full employment, and
there are more people working today than ever before. Those
laid off in technical fields are finding it tough to find
new jobs, that is true. However, that is the area that was
most out of wack when the tech bubble burst and kicked off
the last recession. That will all take a bit of time to resolve
itself. Companies, once burned, are smarter and very reluctant
to make the same mistakes as they redefine and reinvent themselves.
They have gone from being brash to very conservative. We are
still losing manufacturing jobs. Don’t expect that to change
– this is a global economy. But we are much better off than
20 years ago. Back then we were losing manufacturing jobs
and growing the service economy. It was a real concern that
we could not survive as a super economic power if our only
real economic strength was being a service economy. Today,
we don’t hear much anymore about Japan eating our cake, because
then along came the computer and the internet. And America
found it’s niche – technology. Today, that is what we make
and no one comes even close. Technology, including biotechnology,
is our future. It changes everything we touch and the way
we live our lives. Technology is the engine of our economy,
what pulls all the other cars in the train – communication,
medicine, manufacturing, services, transportation, retail,
leisure, etc.
Why do you think the tech heavy NASDAQ went up 50% last year?
Not because of 2003 profits, but because of the promise of
rapid sales and profit growth in 2004 and beyond. And all
the tech stocks to one degree or another had their run-ups
too. What this correction will do is sort out the real winners
from the also-rans. And the way you will know who is for real
is not from the fundamental analysts, but from the collective
opinion of everyone who buys the stocks – just look at the
charts. In the bull market, the rising tide lifted all boats.
This correction has brought some of these stocks down with
a thud. Others have held up quite well. Don’t let pundits,
including many in high places, scare you – they are rarely
right. For example, two of their favorites to bash have been
JNPR and RIMM. Look at the charts of those stocks and you
will see a different story, and yet they have 10-12% of their
shares sold short. LU is another stock that has been performing
well in this correction, and with short interest about 300
million shares (4 days average trading volume) the potential
is explosive above the recent high of $5. Thursday, Lucent
received an analyst upgrade with a price target of $5, which
made me laugh. If LU gets to $5, you definitely do not want
to be selling it there. Where do these guys come from?
We have nothing against selling short. But the risk/reward
in this market is much better to the upside, even in this
corrective phase. Well, I’ve ramble long enough…
Friday the system had buy signals elected in RIMM and SIRI.
Many of the other stocks we had buy signals just marked time,
and are set up again for Monday, if they hit the stop price.
We sold nothing Friday. The System Portfolio Composite is
long ARTX, MCD, LOOK, VSNT, IED, SVVS, LU, XMSR, SIRI and
RIMM. In the IRA account whose account statements I post here,
I own LOOK, SIRI, LU, SVVS, XMSR and VSNT. In my other accounts
I also actually own IED and ARTX.
Daily Commentary – Close Friday January 30, 2004
We are off to a great start in 2004. The markets were very
strong for the first part of the month, topped out and corrected
last week. Depending on which indicators you use the markets
were up 1.6% (S&P 500) to 3.8% (NASDAQ). The IRA account
I post here stood at $39,072, up $5937 or 18% for January.
The Harris brokerage statement will be posted on here when
received. My best (aggressive) account was up 30%.
Where are we now? Good question. We are in a correction,
but is it going to be shallow? We should have some indication
early next week. After looking at the entire list of stocks
we watch, from the way we generate buy signals, it will take
a few days for buy signals with low risk entry points. In
a correction there are very few buy signals. At a bottom and
the first week up, there can be large numbers of stocks with
buy signals.
Thus we did not take any new positions today. Our System
Portfolio Composite is still long 8 stocks: IIJIE, ALAN, ANDW,
DCGN, PROX, GERN, PCLN and ORCH. The $2000 portfolio (buying
$2000 of each stock) was up 15.3%. As of the close Friday
the IRA was all in cash, up 18% for the month, and only ORCH
was in my other accounts.
Daily Commentary – Close Thursday January 29, 2004
Traders wishing to sell stocks, but who were not already
out as of Wednesday, used yesterday's positive opening to
sell during the morning. After the selling dissipated some
bargain hunting came into the market. In view of the mild
correction scenario I discussed yesterday, today’s developments
were positive. This is an interesting time as it becomes obvious
that there are certain stocks which have had big run ups in
January, that are going down begrudgingly. Look at the charts
of stocks (free sites are BigCharts.com and StockCharts.com)
like LU, JDSU, ALAN (in the model portfolio) and BVSN. That
is not to say they won’t take a dive later. BVSN is a classic
example. Last May we almost got a double as it exploded upward
for 2 weeks. After that it did absolutely nothing, spending
the next 7 months sliding all the way back down to $4 per
share. Then it took off again this January (we did not get
in), and has acted very well during the last few days when
tech has been particularly weak. Impressive. Perhaps this
time the stock is for real. I would not think of buying here,
but if and when it corrects in a positive way, as to fit my
systems screens, I will look to buy it. I’ll be anxious to
review the charts of the entire list this weekend to see which
stocks have strong legs and which ones buckled badly under
the strain of the overall market sell off.
We did not sell any of the 8 stocks in the System Portfolio
Composite today. We only had one buy signal today. The stock
did nothing. Thus we did not take any new positions today.
Daily Commentary – Close Wednesday Jan 28, 2004
If yesterday was ugly, today was brutal. The Fed pronouncement
of not raising the interest rates was the catalyst, and analysts
tried to read the nuance of every word and phrase in their
press release. But the real fact is that the market was edgy
and looking to sell off. The suspect market action was confirmed
yesterday and traders dumped stocks with a vengeance. So this
puts us squarely in a corrective phase.
The QQQ is a fair measure of the NASDAQ and the System Portfolio
Composite (which tends to be 2-3 times as volatile). With
yesterday’s close, most of January’s gains have been wiped
out, the QQQ and NASDAQ being up only 2% from 10% at it’s
peak at mid January. My accounts are up a minimum of 18% this
month as of the close today, so we have played this run very
well indeed.
I sold 8 of the 16 stocks in the System Portfolio Composite:
Losses were CHINA (our second position) at 11.27 for a $0.55
per share loss, SATC at 2.70 (loss $ 0.19 per share) and TMTA
at 3.85 ($0.15 per share.) Profits were booked on CHINA (our
first position) at 11.27 for a profit of $3.08 per share,
AMTD at 15.90 ($1.99 per share), SINA at 45.00 ($0.09 per
share), VXGN at 10.05 ($2.64 per share), MTON at 3.10 ($0.49
per share).
We took no new positions today.
So you might be wondering, if I saw this coming and yesterday
was a rout, why didn’t I sell everything. My philosophy is
trade the stocks first, the market second and never trade
on the equity value of the portfolio nor trade on emotion.
Thus, there are 8 stocks that in themselves still look OK
on the charts. Three of the 8 stocks actually went up yesterday.
The question, which will only be answered by the market itself,
is whether this is a short term correction of the last 6 week
run up, or are we going to go into a longer term correction
of the last 7 months. So how to play it? Looking at the S&P,
it has outperformed the NASDAQ. This is the first (and perhaps
only) leg down for the S&P. The NASDAQ on the other hand
is in the third leg down and thus might find a bottom that
is easier to read. Looking at a chart of the QQQ, this great
run started at 34 and ran to 39, so a 50% correction would
be ca. 36.5. The 50 day moving average is about 36.25. Thus
if this is going to be a simple 1-2-3 correction and if the
QQQ hits these levels and stabilizes, we very well could get
another powerful leg up. If any rally from there breaks down,
then we are in for a longer term correction.
The market action of the last week has destroyed the favorable
chart patterns of the stocks we watch in 90% of the cases.
Those stocks may take some time to stabilize and start to
recover. The stronger stocks will hold well during a correction
of this type and will be the ones to take off again. Here
is a case where relative strength is very important in my
screening.
Sorry to be so wordy, but today’s action makes it a very
significant day and I wanted to share my insights.
Daily Commentary – Close Tuesday Jan 27, 2004
Uggggly! The complete opposite of yesterday.
The market opened flat and promptly sold off and went down,
relentlessly, all day. Counter trend was the Nano technology
group we follow. Looks like they have more gas in the tank
still. There are a number of strong stocks that resisted the
down trend setting up buy signals tomorrow. The dilemma is
if the market bounces temporarily, we may put in some of these
stocks and then suffer losses if the weight of a falling market
drags them down. As I have been doing, I will take the lowest
risk trades in conservative quantities. Caution is the order
of the day. But, I do not pretend to know what the overall
market is going to do from here. For me, it’s much easier
to trade specific stocks than the entire market.
All the pundits are making their 2004 predictions, based
on fundamentals of the companies. I look at these companies,
because if they look good technically, they can be good buys
at some point in my system. Fortune Magazine has such an article
“The Top Picks From 50 Great Investor’s.” Only 3 of the 50
were on my watch list. I added none of the other 47 as none
came close to meeting my criteria to get on the watch list.
One stock was actually down 50% over the past 6 months.
Obviously, we took no new positions today, nor were we stopped
out of any positions.
Daily Commentary – Close Monday Jan 26, 2004
Well so much for the correction – at least off of today’s
powerful rally. The S&P was strong making a 31 month new
high and the NASDAQ appears to have saved itself. The volume
wasn’t convincing, but… We took signals today in CHINA (again)
which broke out of the recent consolidation quite nicely.
We also bought ORCH and TMTA. The short we had in XING was
a victim of the strong market and we were stopped at 15.00
for a $0.75 per share loss.
Daily Commentary – Close Friday Jan 23, 2004
After quite a run, the markets this week ran out of steam.
The S&P had been up a remarkable 8 weeks, ending this
week essentially flat. The NASDAQ was up 5 weeks before this
week’s reversal. Is this the start of a correction? It remains
to be seen. The stocks we trade have an average beta of 3,
meaning they are 3 times as volatile as the market averages.
That means we make money faster percentage wise when we are
moving up but it also means we lose faster when going down.
As mentioned yesterday, we continue to monitor the stocks
in the System Portfolio Composite very closely and closed
our positions in 15 more stocks. XLA at 2.70 for a ($.01
loss per share). Profits were taken in ATRS at 37.60 ($3.55
per share), UNTD at 20.02 ($2.82), COMS at 8.49 ($0.26), XYBR
at 1.93 ($0.29), NANO at 21.49 ($4.89), VWPT at 0.88 ($0.08),
ADSK at 26.03 ($1.25), MXT at 6.38 ($1.77), SOFO at 2.00 ($0.04),
AVAN at 3.48 ($0.48), APHT at 7.30 ($0.87), INSM at 3.90 ($0.43),
NTE at 31.90 ($0.90) and STEM at 2.38 ($0.19).
We stayed long 13 stocks that remain strong despite overall
market weakness. Unfortunately, we had none of these 13 in
our IRA account posted here and as of today’s close we were
entirely in cash at $39,200, which is up 18.8% for the month
so far. Not too shabby… The 13 stocks in the System Portfolio
Composite are CHINA, IIJIE, ALAN, AMTD, ANDW, SINA, DCGN,
PROX, VXGN, GERN, SATC, MTON and PCLN.
This market has a lot of momentum, so rather than breaking
down quickly, I would not be surprised if it moved higher
yet, or spent a couple more weeks churning as it puts in a
top. If all that sounds like I have no clue, I couldn’t argue
with you. I am just being very cautious in here. I believe
at some point we will have a major correction which will represent
a great buying opportunity for another strong leg up. I will
continue to take system trading signals but look for very
low risk trades and scale back to about 10% of equity in my
purchases.
Daily Commentary – Close Thursday Jan. 22, 2004
Is this another pause or is this a top we are putting in?
As I read the tea leaves, the NASDAQ says top, the S&P
is neutral. The price action of both indexes was pretty sorry
today. Our $2000 Composite was down 1.5%, worse than any of
the averages all of which were down. My IRA account was actually
down 3% at one point today, but the rally in XYBR and STEM
brought it back to only a 1% loss. The system was long 35
stocks, which were up 19% despite the lousy action. As I discussed
we had tightened stops and today we exited many stocks and
took profits and raised our cash position. Sold for losses
were SONE at 8.64 for a $0.64 per share loss and IPA at 4.70
for a loss of $0.16. Profitable closed trades were PROX at
2.30 (profit $0.69), one from the double position of AMTD
at 16.36 ($2.87 profit), NITE at 14.63 ($0.53 profit), one
of double positions in NTE at 32.16 ($2.90 profit) and ZRAN
at 20.24 ($2.08 profit).
We did not have new long positions today. For the aggressive
accounts the system is short XING. Speaking of short sales,
getting stopped out yesterday in LEXR stings as it was down
$1.92 today on big volume. Oh well…
Daily Commentary – Close Wednesday Jan. 21, 2004
We sold one of our positions in NANO before the close at
21.49 for a $5.24 per share profit. The stock and the entire
group looks tired and the momentum has slowed. Coupled with
my leeriness of the overall market in here and the stock's
weak close made the decision seem like a good one. For the
same reasons I sold my remaining XING at 14.80 for a profit
of $5.79 per share. From our System Portfolio Composite,
we sold one of our double positions in NANO and COMS. We were
stopped out of our one short position, LEXR on the open today
at 18.47 for $1.03 per share loss. As luck would have it,
in after hours trading it was down $1.75.
We received buys signals today PCLN which popped nicely.
STEM, which we bought yesterday and did nothing really popped
today. Our accounts were up 1% or less for the day. The system
composite of all open trades was flat. The S&P had a good
day up 8.85 while the NASDAQ was down 5 points after shaking
off early morning weakness in the tech sector.
After the big Saddam Hussein capture reversal day on Dec.
13th, when the market open up strongly and sold off in a big
reversal, the markets have moved almost straight up since
then – 6 weeks. As I have for the past 2 weeks, I am still
looking for a correction. It has to come. But we continue
to play the game, skeptically. The S&P has risen about
8% and the NASDAQ about 15% since then. Our real accounts,
as well as our System Portfolio Composite has outperformed
the markets significantly, so it has paid big dividends not
to try to outguess the top in the markets.
Daily Commentary – Close Tuesday Jan. 20, 2004
We sold our position in SONS at 9.33 intraday which was after
a breach of a secondary low made in the morning. After the
close SONS was to announce its earnings, but postponed the
release due to their audit not being completed. It spooked
the market and SONS was off $1.50 (11.5%) in after hours trading.
This is the same effect as the market being disappointed in
the quarterly results. These are risks we want to avoid and
it looks like we have saved ourselves a 2% hit to our portfolio
balance. We got executed on buy signals in AWA and also got
stopped out of it today for a 32 cent loss per share. Other
buys were IPA, XLA, MTON STEM and NTE. All had impressive
breakouts except for STEM which went nowhere.
We got stopped out of VPHM at 3.17 and JMAR at 3.90. VPHM
looked like a nice trade, up 20% in 6 days, then yesterday
they clobbered it on very high volume of over 2 million shares. The
hot NANO technology group looks tired, except for ALTI, which
has been trading counter trend to the group lately. We had
a tight stop on JMAR and will also tighten down our stops
on NANO, which has been very profitable for us so far.
Our System Portfolio Composite is now long 38 stocks (33
different plus 5 double positions in PROX, NANO, NTE AMTD
and COMS. Based on our “$2000 Composite” these stocks are
up 19.7%. I am actually up about the same percent, owning
9 of these stocks. On balance it was a flat day for our positions
with the S&P down a touch and the NASDAQ up a touch.
Daily Commentary – Close Friday Jan. 16, 2004
The earnings for the much maligned Juniper Networks (JNPR)
surprised the street and the stock along with the entire networking
sector took off. We had a buy stop on SONS at 8.33 and it
really popped closing at 9.28. However, be aware that SONS
reports quarterly earnings after the close on Tuesday Jan
20th. Despite it looking strong, you have to consider the
risk of holding through the announcement. I will close the
position before the close Tuesday.
After a great run, I liquidated my position in Lucent (LU) at
$4.75 Friday, $.14 better than the closing price for a profit
of $1.81 per share in only 9 trading days (60% gain). Lucent
is due to announce earnings BEFORE the market opens on Wednesday
January 21st. I may have been premature, but the price action
looked tired on Friday and since the stock appears very overextended
short term, it was either take the money off the table now
or before the close on Tuesday. I elected today.
XING, the Chinese Telephone Company completed a nice 5 wave
advance on Friday, closing down at $14.26. I took partial
profits (bought Jan 2nd at $9.01).
We’ve had a remarkable run in the markets to start the new
year. Of course, it can’t continue straight up, but so long
as the overall market at least churns as opposed to taking
a major reversal on high volume, we’ll stay with it. But
I will get tight with stops.
In the IRA account posted here monthly, as of Friday’s close
I held XYBR, AVAN, VPHM, JMAR, SONE and SONS. In my other
accounts also were APHT, ADSK, INSM, XING and NANO.